U.S. Geological Survey professional paper; 1780 (Reston, 2010). - ОГЛАВЛЕНИЕ / CONTENTS
Навигация

Архив выставки новых поступлений | Отечественные поступления | Иностранные поступления | Сиглы
ОбложкаMercury in Indiana watersheds: retrospective for 2001-2006 / M.R.Risch et al.; prepared in cooperation with the Indiana Department of Environmental Management - Reston: U.S. Geological Survey, 2010. - x, 78 p.: col. ill., col. maps. - (U.S. Geological Survey professional paper; 1780). - Ref.: p. 62-66. - ISBN 978-1-4113-2952-2
 

Оглавление / Contents
 
Abstract ........................................................ 1
Introduction .................................................... 2
   Mercury Cycling in Aquatic Ecosystems ........................ 2
   Health Effects, Criteria, and Advisories for Mercury ......... 4
   Description of the Study Area ................................ 5
   Purpose and Scope ............................................ 5
Methods of Study ................................................ 6
   Sources of Data .............................................. 6
   Organization of Data ........................................ 14
   Mercury Load Calculations ................................... 14
Mercury in Indiana Watersheds .................................. 19
   Mercury in Streams .......................................... 19
   Mercury in Fish ............................................. 36
   Sources of Mercury .......................................... 41
      Atmospheric Mercury Deposition ........................... 41
      Mercury Emissions to the Atmosphere ...................... 47
      Mercury in Wastewater .................................... 50
      Land Cover ............................................... 53
Summary and Conclusions ........................................ 60
References ..................................................... 62

Appendix 1. Supplemental Data .................................. 67

Figures
  1.  Diagram showing the mercury cycle in aquatic ecosystems ... 3
2-4.  Maps showing:
  2.  Indiana monitoring stations for mercury in streams,
      with upstream watershed boundaries, monitoring stations
      for mercury in precipitation, and sampling locations
      for mercury in fish tissue ................................ 7
  3.  National Atmospheric Deposition Program Mercury
      Deposition Network stations used to compute average
      annual total mercury concentrations in precipitation in
      Indiana, and National Weather Service Cooperative
      Observer Network sites used to compute average annual
      precipitation in Indiana, 2001-2006 ....................... 9
  4.  Treatment works in Indiana with total mercury analyses
      of wastewater-effluent samples, 2002-2005; upstream
      watershed boundaries are shown for monitoring stations
      on streams ............................................... 10
  5.  Graph showing annual emissions of mercury to the
      atmosphere from all categories of sources in Indiana in
      2002 and 2005 ............................................ 11
6-7.  Maps showing:
  6.  Stationary sources of mercury emissions to the
      atmosphere in Indiana in 2002 and 2005; upstream
      watershed boundaries are shown for monitoring stations
      on streams ............................................... 12
  7.  Permitted wastewater outfalls in Indiana in 2005;
      upstream watershed boundaries are shown for monitoring
      stations on streams ...................................... 13
  8.  Box plots showing distributions of unfiltered total
      mercury concentrations in water samples at monitoring
      stations on Indiana streams, 2002-2006 ................... 21
  9.  Graph showing average percentages of filtered and
      particulate total mercury in water samples at
      monitoring stations on Indiana streams, 2002-2006 ........ 24
  10. Graph and box plots showing relations of particulate
      total mercury concentrations in water samples to
      turbidity values and ranges of turbidity in water at
      the time of sample collection at monitoring stations on
      Indiana streams, 2002-2006 ............................... 26
  11. Box plots showing distributions of unfiltered and
      filtered total mercury concentrations in water samples
      at monitoring stations on Indiana streams, grouped by
      daily mean streamflow category for instantaneous
      streamflow at time of sample collection, 2002-2006 ....... 30
  12. Map showing average annual stream yields of total
      mercury in watersheds upstream from monitoring stations
      on Indiana streams, 2002-2006 ............................ 32
  13. Box plots showing distributions of wet-weight and dry-
      weight mercury concentrations in fish-tissue samples
      from watersheds in Indiana, 1993-2004 .................... 37
  14. Isopleth map of average annual mercury wet-deposition
      rates, 2001-2006, showing upstream watershed boundaries
      for monitoring stations on Indiana streams ............... 42
15-17 Maps showing:
  15. Ratios of average annual stream mercury yield to
      atmospheric mercury wet-deposition loading in
      watersheds upstream from monitoring stations on Indiana
      streams, 2001-2006 ....................................... 46
  16. Treatment works upstream from monitoring stations on
      Indiana streams, with average total mercury
      concentrations in samples of wastewater effluent, 2002-
      2005 ..................................................... 51
  17. Land-cover types in watersheds upstream from monitoring
      stations on Indiana streams .............................. 59

Tables
  1.  Monitoring stations on Indiana streams, 2002-2006, and
      upstream drainage areas .................................. 16
  2.  Summary statistics for mercury concentrations in water
      samples from monitoring stations on Indiana streams,
      2002-2006 ................................................ 20
  3.  Total mercury concentrations in water samples from
      monitoring stations on Indiana streams, 2002-2006, with
      comparisons to Indiana water-quality criteria ............ 22
  4.  Filtered total mercury and estimated particulate
      mercury concentrations in water samples from monitoring
      stations on Indiana streams, 2002-2006 ................... 25
  5.  Unfiltered methylmercury concentrations in water
      samples at monitoring stations on Indiana streams,
      2002-2006 ................................................ 28
  6.  Seasonal Kendall test for trends in unfiltered total
      mercury concentrations in water samples from monitoring
      stations on Indiana streams, 2002-2006 ................... 29
  7.  Average annual stream loads and yields of unfiltered
      total mercury and unfiltered methylmercury in
      watersheds upstream from monitoring stations on Indiana
      streams, 2002-2006 ....................................... 34
  8.  Mercury concentrations in fish-tissue samples from
      watersheds upstream from monitoring stations on Indiana
      streams, 1993-2004 ....................................... 38
  9.  Mercury concentrations in fish-tissue samples near
      monitoring stations on Indiana streams, 1993-2004 ........ 40
  10. Average annual atmospheric mercury wet-deposition loads
      and loading rates, 2001-2006, and average annual stream
      yields of total mercury, 2002-2006, in watersheds
      upstream from monitoring stations on Indiana streams ..... 44
  11. Atmospheric mercury species concentrations, vertical
      deposition velocities, and annual dry-deposition rates
      in Indiana, 2004 ......................................... 45
  12. Annual atmospheric mercury dry-deposition and wet-
      deposition loading rates and annual stream yields of
      total mercury in watersheds upstream from monitoring
      stations on Indiana streams .............................. 48
  13. Average total mercury concentrations in grab samples of
      wastewater effluent at treatment works upstream from
      monitoring stations on Indiana streams, 2002-2005 ........ 52
  14. Number of permitted outfalls in 2005 for watersheds
      upstream from monitoring stations on Indiana streams ..... 54
  15. Land-cover types, by percentage of watershed drainage
      area and land area in watersheds upstream from
      monitoring stations on Indiana streams ................... 56
  16. Watersheds upstream from monitoring stations on Indiana
      streams, grouped by upstream drainage-area size .......... 58

Appendix 1 Tables
  1-1. Correlations of mercury concentrations with
       instantaneous streamflow at monitoring stations on
       Indiana streams, 2002-2006 .............................. 68
  1-2. Statistical values separating categories of daily
       average streamflow at monitoring stations on Indiana
       streams, 2002-2006 ...................................... 69
  1-3. Annual stream loads and yields of unfiltered total
       mercury and unfiltered methylmercury in watersheds
       upstream from monitoring stations on Indiana streams,
       2002-2006 ............................................... 70
  1-4. Model characteristics of annual stream loads of
       mercury in watersheds up stream from monitoring
       stations on Indiana streams, 2002-2006 .................. 75
  1-5. Number of stationary sources of mercury emissions to
       the atmosphere and annual mercury emissions in 2002
       and 2005 for watersheds upstream from monitoring
       stations on Indiana streams ............................. 76
  1-6. Percentages of land-cover classes in watersheds
       upstream from monitoring stations on Indiana streams .... 77


Архив выставки новых поступлений | Отечественные поступления | Иностранные поступления | Сиглы
 

[О библиотеке | Академгородок | Новости | Выставки | Ресурсы | Библиография | Партнеры | ИнфоЛоция | Поиск]
  Пожелания и письма: branch@gpntbsib.ru
© 1997-2024 Отделение ГПНТБ СО РАН (Новосибирск)
Статистика доступов: архив | текущая статистика
 

Документ изменен: Wed Feb 27 14:22:04 2019. Размер: 13,155 bytes.
Посещение N 1529 c 05.04.2011